Friday, March 03, 2006

Difensa: One of Special Warfare's First Battles

Welcome to a Blog devoted to the origins of the special forces, particularly the First Special Service Force (FSSF), a WWII Canadian-American commando unit that along with the OSS’s Jedburghs and Darby’s Rangers pioneered special warfare.

I asked Capt. Larry Basha of the US special forces what the greatest achievement of the FSSF in the history of special warfare. Basha cited the Force’s first and most celebrated operation, the attack on Monte la Difensa in central Italy in December 1943. This posting explores this battle and battlefield!


According to Basha, Difensa was historic because it was an operation that initiated the collapse of the German’s Winter Line (although the final collapse would come after months of hard fighting), and changed the course of the Italian war. Until the small hours of December 3 when the FSSF’s 2nd Regiment scaled cliffs behind and surprised the German Panzergrenadiers on the summit of Difensa, the foremost and most important peak overlooking the Mignano Gap and the entrance way into the Lira Valley, the Allied advance up the Italian peninsula had stalled completely. The Difensa operation the FSSF conducted that night kick-started this offensive, and because the Force was made up of 1,800 fighters and 2nd Regiment a mere 600 men (probably 200 of which fought in the initial battle) it is no wonder this operation is still studied today.

The FSSF did not attack Difensa in isolation. Their attack corresponded with a British effort to seize the neighboring peak of Monte Camino and the U.S. 142nd attack on Monte Maggiore. But Difensa was the lynchpin. The summit was seized in two hours of fighting, although it took days to clear the Panzergrenadiers from the entire mountain complex. Still Difensa arguably was where a chapter in special forces-history was born.

I visited Difensa for the second time last September, and for the first time explored the slope above the village of Caspoli, roughly where Camino and Difensa are joined. I found the climb exhausting and arduous, and my respect for the FSSF and their accomplishment was heightened.

But as I climbed three FSSF re-enactors wearing the uniforms and carrying the kit that the Force men went into battle with where returning down the mountain after scaling the slope the day before and spending a rainy night on the summit.

John Dallimore and Paul Dray told Special Forces Then and Now their impressions after inspecting firsthand this high-altitude battlefield.

Paul Dray said of the Difensa: “It was smaller than I thought, and I was kind of surprised to find the emplacements still intact. I have to admit, I had done some research, but now that I have been there, I read accounts and have a three dimensional picture in my head... the climb must have been horrendous, it was bad enough for us, but for them -- the wind, sleet, darkness, and the constant threat of death.”

John Dallimore had this to say:

Q: How did your understanding of the Difensa battle change after climbing the peak, and inspecting the plateau first hand?
DALLIMORE: The battle itself would have been very close combat. Footing was terrible and I cannot imagine making bold runs in the fog over the rocky terrain.
Q: What was the one thing about Difensa that was most different than you had imagined?
DALLIMORE: The biggest shock was how small the area at the top was. If all of 2nd Regiment was at the summit, it would have been crowded! The climb wasn't bad, but the footing was awful and you had to watch your step constantly. I cannot imagine running over this ground and avoiding enemy fire.
Q. Was it a tougher than you imagined?
DALLIMORE: I enjoyed the climb. I thought that it would be harder than it was. We climbed using the same uniforms and equipment the force used in 1943. Corcoran jump boots are not ideal climbing boots!
Q. You said to me in Italy that inspecting the battlefield also changed your views of the British action on Camino.
DALLIMORE: I gained a whole new respect for what the British had to face on Camino. Whereas the Force could use the element of surprise by coming up the most unexpected route, the British had no choice but to do a head on assault with poor cover. It was on a par with the assault up Mt. Cassino. Luckily they did take that mountain, because the FSSF would have been in trouble if the germans had not been pushed off that peak.
Thanks to John and Paul for their impressions on this historic battlefield.

13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just thought I would tell you....I had dinner with 6 of the remaining Canadian FSSF that climbed that Mountain. They remember like it had just happened.......Their last Reunion will be August 16-19, 2006 Helena, Montana. I am truly in awe of these men and their wives.

5:09 a.m., May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would like to comment on a few of the stories listed here. Firstly La Difensa was not the prominent emanence in the Camino-Maggiore Hill Mass. It was Camino. I would also like to remind you that the Force objective on December 3 was Hill 907 (Monte Remetanea). I would also like to clarify that the effort by X Corps and II Corps was interlocked. While X Corps repeatedly took and lost their objective - which was a precursor to the Monte Casino fighting - the fact that the FSSF did not take their objective on 3 December made it all the more troublesome for the British. Remember the 142 did fight beyond Hill 907 on the right. This left a gap in the center of the line. Much of the enemy fire that did occur came from a direction that could have been erradicated if the center of the line had met its final objective and this may have also produced results for the British. It would have effectively placed the Force slightly behind the enemy positions on the northeastern face of Camino. That said, it was a heroic effort on the part of all. But please remember the others that fought that day. Things rarely ever go according to plan, but please dont try and cover it up by waving the flag.

4:24 p.m., September 09, 2006  
Blogger Charles Schurke said...

I am the son of an FSSF member who won his purple heart at Anzio. I've just started doing the research. I'm really disappointed I didn't know about the '06 reunion, I would certainly have tried to attend. I would like to hear from an FSSF survivor to communicate with and possibly pay a visit to.

Charles Schurke, St joseph, MO son of
Everett Schurke from IA

4:09 a.m., February 18, 2008  
Blogger Charles Schurke said...

I am the son of an FSSF member that won his purple heart at Anzio. I have just started doing the research about the FSSF. I'm very disappointed I didn't know about the reunion in 06 I would certainly have tried to attend. I would like to hear from a surviving member to correspond with and, possibly visit.

Charles Schurke, St. Joseph, MO son of Everett Schurke from IA

4:16 a.m., February 18, 2008  
Blogger force133 said...

The last time I posted on this blog I did not notice the comments Bill Story made regarding Colonel Don Williamson. Firstly, I have heard a lot from Story regarding Williamson. Most of it, I have disproven. I have conducted extensive research on the incident surrounding Williamson.

After all these years I still find it amazing that Story has to continue to drag his name through the dirt. Many vets I have spoken to have said enough is enough. I frankly think Story is attempting to make himself feel better after being part of the group that ousted Williamson.

Williamson could not read a map. This is nonsense. He rose through the ranks of the Dufferin and Haldimand Rifles and was made a Company Commander. He successfully completed a Senior Officers Course at RMC and promoted to Major. I find it very difficult to beleive that after all this training and being part of the D&HR since 1921, he could not read a map.

Story told me once that Williamson was kicked out of the D&HR. I found in records that the D&HR was dispersed and his men dispersed to units overseas. This left Williamson searching for an assignment. He immediately chose to go to Ottawa to be interviewed for the Force. He was not kicked out of the unit.

As for La Difensa, I have all the known paper work on this action in relation to Williamson. After extensive research, I have found some startling documents which paint a new light on his command there. In more than one source, Williamson's ability to place artillery support, where required, is recounted. In order to do this, one has to be able to read a map.

Many of the accusations made against him during the action have now been disproven. The only thing we do not know is exactly his behaviour during that three or four hour window from Dec 2-3.

We have been told he panicked. However that is the account of a select few men. Men, I may add, who were not privy to information that Williamson had or was recieving.

All I know is, Williamson was abandoned by these select men and no effort to help him was made. This is even if the event actually occurred. Bill Story for one had no clue of what Williamson was doing that morning. He was not aware of his orders. Orders direct from Frederick.

Like I said, Story continues to spread rumours. He also told me that Williamson promoted him in order to keep his mouth shut about the incident. This is not true. I have a list of several NCO's made up before the operation in case replacement officers are required. Story is on that list including several others who were promoted who had nothing to do with the supposed incident.

Anyway I could go on and on about the inaccuracies and nonsense being spread about Williamson.

I find it disgusting, that in this modern day, some 60 odd years later, people continue to defame the name of Don Williamson. I have a good idea of what occurred up there on 3 Dec however even if the man did temporarily lose control,and I am not saying he did, he does not deserve being dragged through the mud, esp without evidence being presented. The only evidence presented are the several affidavits. I have all of these. These create even more suspician in favour of Williamson. They contradict each other and bring forward points that actually support Williamson.

I would personally take the word of Colonel Cookman Marshall over that of Story, Moore and even Frederick.

Anyway I continue to research this incident and I continue to find evidence in support of Williamson. I hope to publish this in future.

7:46 p.m., March 10, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Force 133, this is John Nadler. Thank you for your comment about Williamson. I have been fascinated by this man, but never had the opportunity to research him with the same care that you have. So I appreciate your post, as I have always felt that he was probably misunderstood. At worst, I suspect he was very humane, and was truly horrified by the losses his men endured. Lorin Waling, who died the other day, told me he remembered Williamson walking among the dead of Difensa, and repeating: Oh my boys, Oh my boys.' A soldier might find this weak, but as a civilian I find it perfectly understandable and even admirable. I'd like to talk to you more about Williamson. Could you email me at Johnanadler@gmail.com? I'd like to discuss Williamson more. Lastly, are you Ken Joyce? Anyway, please send me a note. I'd like to hear more about Williamson. It was one my regrets about my book that I didn't know more about him as I was writing it. I would have liked to present him in a more sympathetic light.

10:34 a.m., March 11, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My father was on the mountain, and gave an author a detailed description of the events leading up to the assault and the events on top of the mountain. I am willing to share this
30-minute account if it would help anyone. Dad attended the last reunion in Hamilton, Canada, many years ago, and he passed on in 1992. You can contact me at 937-271-4077

Respectfully,

Ed Davis

10:53 p.m., August 13, 2008  
Blogger william douglas said...

I am a surviving son of SSGT William Douglas FSSF HQ Det 2nd REG and was wondering if anyone remembers him. I would love to here from you.

Thanks
Mr. Joyce needs to remember that many lives had already been lost trying to take La Difensa by other units with no success before the FSSF arrived. Give our boys a break!

6:45 a.m., January 06, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My name is Steve Hogan and I'm married to Cindy Hufft. We are trying to piece together information regarding her Dad, General Raymond F. Hufft who fought with the FSSF as a Major and later with General Fredericks in the 45th Division of the Seventh Army. If anyone has information about my Father in law I can be reached at rshogan@earthlink.net. Thanks

1:47 a.m., October 26, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am the daughter of William "Sam" Magee, an original member of the FSSF Devil's Brigade. I am sure he would be happy to correspond with you, Charles, and any others. He joined Paul and John on their climb of la Difensa last yr with the Living History Group. How do I reach you to supply his email address?

2:47 p.m., November 11, 2009  
Anonymous Bill Wayne said...

Wow, going back to history. I appreciate having some insights from the past as I'm starting to have interest on military stuff. In fact, I bought some jack bauer 24 gear just recently.

4:29 p.m., September 09, 2010  
Anonymous Army Surplus said...

Things rarely ever go according to plan, but please dont try and cover it up by waving the flag.

11:07 a.m., March 26, 2011  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hello everybody, I know these entries are fairly old by now, but if anyone happenes to stumble upon these readings whom are knowledgable about the FSSF, as well as the soldiers and officers who fought together in this unit, I am looking for any information I can about my grandfather, General Raymond F Hufft, who fought with the FSSF for quite some time. Most of his descendants have passed away unfortunately, with the exception of my Mother, Hufft's daughter, and she herself does not know much about his military career or at least detailed accounts of his participation/actions during his time with the FSSF. I am desperate for information, for I feel like I do not know much about him. I am trying to get the information I gather about him into a documented file of stories from soldiers who fought beside him or whom have heard of him, eyewitness accounts, images, etc., so my family will no longer have to be unsure about who our forefather was, and what he was able to accomplish and do for the beeterment of our country. Thank you rcbhogan@gmail.com (928) 442-6216

5:11 p.m., November 18, 2016  

Post a Comment

<< Home